A Comprehensive Professional Development Program to Prepare Effective Teacher Leaders in Science
Authors: Carolyn Church Landel, George Nelson, Mark Emmet, Tom Hathorn, Steve Gammon, Daniel Hanley, Jim Minstrell, Ruth Anderson

« Back to Poster Hall
5. Conclusions

The data suggest that the NCOSP research-based professional development program had a positive impact on participating Teacher Leaders, their students, and their teaching colleagues. The carefully constructed three year sequence of learning experiences including immersions in science content, connections to instructional materials, and classroom practice had a positive impact on Teacher Leaders' understanding of science content, effective science instruction, how students learn science, and their own metacognitive skills. Additional experiences in collaborative practices, facilitation strategies, and leadership skills provided Teacher Leaders with the knowledge and confidence needed to engage their peers in effective professional learning experiences and begin to support instructional improvements at the building level. All of the learning experiences were grounded in research, articulated a clear framework for instruction, collaboration, and leadership, and provided multiple opportunities for Teacher Leaders to interact and develop their knowledge and skills in all of these areas over time. This strategic, systematic approach to professional development resulted in positive and measureable changes in Teacher Leaders' knowledge and skills, high satisfaction ratings from their colleagues, and improved learning outcomes for their students. These findings offer insight into the experiences necessary to prepare effective Teacher Leaders.

 

References

Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leaderships. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.

Fullan, M. (1994). Teacher leadership: A failure to conceptualize. In D.R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp.241-253). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Lambert, L. (2003). Shifting conceptions of leadership: Towards a redefinition of leadership for the twenty-first century. In B. Davies & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of educational leadership and management (pp.5-15). London: Pearson Education.

Lieberman, A. and L. Miller. (2004). Teacher leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Little, J.W. (2003). Constructions of teacher leadership in three periods of policy and reform activism. School Leadership and Management, 23(4), 401-419.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N., & Stiles, K.E.. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Moller, G. and M. Katzenmeyer. (1996). The promise of teacher leadership. In G. Moller and M. Katzenmeyer (Eds.), Every teacher as a leader: Realizing the potential of teacher leadership (pp.1-17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: the science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Wasley, P. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and the realities of practice. New York: Teachers College Press.