Changing Teachers' Attitudes and Practices Through Professional Development
Authors: W. Gary Martin, Marilyn E. Strutchens, Michael E. Woolley, Melissa C. Gilbert

Contents
3. Design, Data & Analysis
Print Poster
« Back to Poster Hall
3. Design, Data & Analysis
Next »

The sample for this analysis was comprised of teachers from schools of all grade levels that had participated in TEAM-Math for up to three years as of Spring 2008. This sample included 655 elementary and 178 secondary teachers from 58 schools representing all 14 school districts in the TEAM-Math partnership. In terms of years of involvement in the program, 353 teachers were from schools in their third year of involvement, 255 from schools in their second year, while 225 teachers were in their first year.  With respect to demographics, 749 teachers were female, while 78 were male. 556 were white, 196 were African-American, 38 chose "other" race or ethnicity, 25 were Asian American, 3 were Native American, 2 were Hispanic, while 2 were identified as Biracial or Multiracial.

Three critical variables were included in the analysis. Participation in TEAM-Math was measured by the number of hours each year (across the first three years of the project) that a teacher attended summer institutes, trainings, meetings, workshops, and other TEAM-Math activities.

Attitudes towards reform teaching practices (ATRP) and Use of reform teaching practices in the classroom (URP) was measured with teacher self-report survey items completed in year three of the project. To measure ATRP, teachers indicated their beliefs about reform teaching practices by their level of agreement with five statements such as: Students should understand the meaning of a mathematical concept before they memorize the definitions and procedures associated with that concept, and Teachers should allow students to figure out their own ways of solving mathematics problems. These survey questions had five response options for teachers to choose from which ranged from "Strongly Agree" (4) to "Strongly Disagree" (0).  These five items were summed to create a total score for ATRP. To measure URP, teachers indicated their use of reform teaching practices by their level of agreement with four items indicating how often students engaged in certain instructional activities in their classroom, for example: Present how they solved a problem to the class, and Take tests where they have to explain their answers. These survey questions also had five response options for teachers to choose from which ranged from "All or Almost All" (4) to "Never" (0).  These four items were likewise summed to create a total score for each teacher.

A correlational analysis was carried out to test the relationship of Participation with ATRP and URP.